Dick Gozinia 3:59 Tue Dec 1
Livingstone at it again
|
|
Claims the 7/7 suicide bombers “gave their lives” to protest against the Iraq War.
Champagne socialist prick!
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/ken-livingstone-blasted-by-relatives-of-77-terror-victims-over-stupid-question-time-comments-a3127121.html
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
JohnnyL
11:57 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
I respect Corbyn's views but as Leader of HM Opposition .... So bloody weak. He says we will put our troops in danger but get real, it isn't bloody paintball.
|
Rodfarts
11:55 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
Abbott
Livingstone
Corbyn
Blair
Brown
Disgusting vile CUNTS
I would love to chop their fingers off with tin snips and feed them to them. Then chop bits of their arms off in 4 inch pieces with a blunt hacksaw.
So that it gives them great pain and me a great workout.
|
After8
7:50 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
Abbott, just.
|
Marston Hammer
11:59 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
Abbott
Livingstone
Corbyn
|
Eddie B
11:56 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
Who's worse - Abbott, Livingstone or Corbyn?
|
Far Cough
11:49 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
I don't think Corbyn is a throwback, can't think of any Labour leader in the past that would have had his views on dealing with terrorists, the way he has?
The bloke is a 100% fruitloop
|
Sven Roeder
11:45 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
I'm not so sure Livingstones views have changed. Maybe he is just being more honest about them now.
Emboldened by the appointment of the 70's throwback as Labour leader.
Am not sure how aware just how aware of how ridiculous they look to your average Joe Voter they are .
Corbyn was wearing one of those Chairman Mao hats on the march at the weekend wasn't he?
Must say that made me laugh. At least it wasn't a Wolfie Smith beret.
|
mallard
11:45 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
Whatever happened to the good ol' leader of The GLC?
I used to enjoy travelling from Plaistow to Upmiinster for 15p !!
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
11:40 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
To be fair to comma, who I have regular spats with, I think, like many, he was initially unaware quite how specific Livingstone had been in his absolution of the terrorists from guilt. When he read them (or looked at the QT clip) he condemned Livingstone's remarks as strongly as anyone else has.
|
Russ of the BML
9:51 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
At the end of the day it's a fucking ridiculous thing to say. And very offensive.
|
After8
8:11 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
Fair enough comma but Livingstone has always been like this.
|
,
1:06 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
You need to read back down this thread to see what I said about the Livingstone comment re absolving of the suicide bombers before charging me of being mealy mouthed.
And that comment of Livingstone's is comparatively recent. That is why I speculated that his views, like loads of other people's, can change over time.
Why should I not use Doris as well as Ken when giving examples of politicians saying things which cause problems?
|
After8
12:59 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
Hold on comma, you are being a bit mealy mouthed about this.
Livingstone has not changed his views over time.
His views are offensive.
I would have expected you to say so than try and deflect attention by throwing Boris Johnson into the mix.
|
,
12:56 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
Livingstone, like lots of people might alter his views over time. Like Doris in Isra'el recently he is prone to saying things in a way that upsets and annoys people.
|
whu
12:48 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
shows what a mess those labour nobodies are in
keep wheeling out this outdated commie cunt and the anti-white diane abbot
tories have been shooting fish in a barrel, absolutely zero opposition party
|
Nicey
12:31 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
Yes comma, so why wasn't livingstone stating his true opinion then?
Too much to lose?
|
,
12:23 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
As a matter of interest the 7/7 bombings happened the day following London being awarded the 2012 Olympic games.
I do not know of any UK politician who has done other than condemn the actions of that day's suicide bombers .
|
Ronald_antly
12:15 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
Is the Daily Mail allowed?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2857816/Israel-vents-fury-France-parliament-votes-recognise-Palestine-state.html
Particular attention on this statement;
"And Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has called the French vote a 'grave mistake'. "
|
riosleftsock
12:01 Wed Dec 2
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
Ronald_antly 11:49 Tue Dec 1
Ok, Tony, can you quantify and substantiate this ridiculous assertion?
Without referring to PressTv, Infowars, Alex Jones, RT or any other loony youtube link.
|
Ronald_antly
11:49 Tue Dec 1
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
After8 wrote...
"France was attacked and they didn't invade Iraq. "
No, but they did piss off Israel.
|
Nicey
11:41 Tue Dec 1
Re: Livingstone at it again
|
This was his opinion then which alters greatly from the shite he is spouting now:
“That isn’t an ideology, it isn’t even a perverted faith – it is just an indiscriminate attempt at mass murder and we know what the objective is. They seek to divide Londoners. They seek to turn Londoners against each other.”
|
| 
